A. Where We Left Off As noted in Part III, movants seeking approval of structured dismissal motions typically must prove that the proposed dismissal is in the best interest of the creditors. To do so, movants will usually have to prove that the dismissal provides better treatment than would a liquidation. To that end, most […]
Structured Dismissals Part IV – Bells & Whistles: Sweetening the Pot and Drawing Objections
Alternatives to a Bankruptcy Filing
Debtors and creditors alike should understand that no debt restructuring option is perfect and that different options have advantages and disadvantages. To learn more, click on the link below to an article recently published by the online news site Hotel News Now: http://www.hotelnewsnow.com/Article/16344
Working for Free: Supreme Court Holds that Fees Incurred Defending Fee Application are not Recoverable
The Bankruptcy Code allows bankruptcy trustees, debtors in possession, and official committees to hire attorneys, accountants, and other professionals to assist them in carrying out their statutory duties, with their fees to be paid by the bankruptcy estate. However, to get paid, these professionals must obtain approval from the bankruptcy court. But what happens when […]
Providing Notice Under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act: Get it Exactly Right, or Risk Not Getting Paid
A recent decision by the District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina demonstrates just how important it is for parties asserting rights under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) to provide proper notice. Failing to correctly provide notice means that the creditor is not entitled to the PACA trust fund protections. In most […]
Setoffs – Cutting Your Losses Both Inside and Outside Bankruptcy
Read Director Joseph Coleman’s article in CRF New on setoffs. Setoffs- Cutting Your Losses Both Inside And Outside Bankruptcy
Springtime is Stern Time
On May 26, 2015, continuing a springtime ritual for bankruptcy lawyers, the Supreme Court issued its latest “progeny of Stern” ruling on the adjudicative authority of the bankruptcy courts. In a 6-3 decision the Court held that “Our precedents make clear that litigants may validly consent to adjudication by the bankruptcy courts.” Wellness Int’l Network, […]
Fifth Circuit has Second Thoughts on Pro-Snax Fees Decision
How would you like to be paid only for work which, in hindsight, unquestionably resulted in a material benefit to your employer? That unsuccessful sales call? Freebie. That account you spent hours trying to collect, but ultimately had to write off? That’s on your time. Thanks. Well, bankruptcy lawyers wouldn’t like that compensation arrangement any […]
Trademark Licensor Rights Trump Bankrupt Licensee
While Donald Trump’s presidential aspirations and “Celebrity Apprentice” hosting duties make for interesting copy, the most recent news concerning him relates to the bankruptcy case of Trump Entertainment and the interaction between bankruptcy and trademark law. To learn more, click on the link below to an article recently published by the online news site Hotel […]
STRUCTURED DISMISSALS – HOW THEY WORK PART III: THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CREDITORS TEST
A. Where We Left Off Part II of this series focused on the first element of section 1112(b)’s dismissal test: whether “cause” exists for the court to dismiss or convert the case. Once the judge determines that cause exists, the court must dismiss or convert the case. As a result, a party seeking the approval […]
Litigant Consent and the Power of the Bankruptcy Court
The Supreme Court is currently considering the case of Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Shariff. As discussed in the blog post on February 16, 2015, at issue in the Wellness International Network case is “whether Article III of the United States Constitution permits the exercise of judicial powers of the United States by the bankruptcy […]